A Webquest for Website Evaluation |
|
You need skills to determine valuable websites from those filled with misinformation! |
This lesson should give you an idea of what to consider when evaluating websites.
|
| You will work in pairs to view one of the following sites on tobacco. You will then complete an |
evaluation checklist
. After viewing all of them, we will use
ranking
worksheet
in a group exercise to rank them from most to least valuable for doing a report on
the health effects of tobacco
.
|
|
| Please view one of the following websites and use the |
evaluation checklist
provided:
|
| The |
evaluation checklist
will cover the following criteria:
Accuracy
: Being true, correct, or exact
Authority
: An accepted source of information or advice
Objectivity
: Based on facts and without emotional or personal prejudice
Currency
: Being up-to-date
Coverage
: The extent to which something is observed, analyzed, and reported
To cover ground more efficiently, each person will choose different criteria to evaluate.
The
content specialist
will determine
accuracy
,
currency
and
coverage
.
The
credibility specialist
will determining
authority
and
objectivity
.
|
| You will be evaluated on your completed evaluation checklists, ranking worksheet, and your participation in the large group discussion using this |
rubric
.
|
| Almost all of y |
ou use the internet for information. The Internet is only one of a variety of information options. Remember that journals, books, videos and other sources are available as well. Evaluating information is a skill you will be using throughout your lifetime.
|
|
Thanks go out to:
Joyce Valenza's |
A Webquest About Evaluating Websites
Cornell University Library's |
Five Criteria for Evaluating Web Pages
|
|
A Webquest for Website Evaluation
|
|
Evaluation Checklist
|
|
Content Specialist Questions:
Accuracy
: Being true, correct, or exact
Currency
: Being up-to-date
Coverage
: The extent to which something is observed, analyzed, and reported
Accuracy
|
Yes
|
|
No
|
Are the authors of the site clearly stated?
|
|
|
Is the name of the institution clearly stated?
|
|
Do the authors provide sources for their information?
|
|
Do the authors provide a way of contacting them?
|
|
Totals:
|
|
|
|
Currency
|
Is it clear that the page was updated in 2007?
|
|
Do the links work? (try a few)
|
|
Totals:
|
|
|
|
Coverage
|
Is there more text on the page than images?
|
|
Is the information factual?
|
|
Are there links to credible websites?
|
|
Do they seem to cover all sides of the topic?
|
|
Totals:
|
|
|
|
Credibility Specialist Questions:
Authority
: An accepted source of information or advice
Objectivity
: Based on facts and without emotional or personal prejudice or bias
Authority
|
Yes
|
|
No
|
Do the authors state their credentials (evidence of knowledge on the subject)?
|
Does the institution state its credentials?
Does it end in an .edu, .gov, .org, .info, or .net?
Is the site a professional (not personal page)?
Totals:
|
|
|
Objectivity
|
Does it have little or no advertising?
Does the author use objective language (without passion)?
Are there little or no opinions stated (beliefs, conclusions)?
Is the institution without bias or prejudice (due to a profit or other motive)?
Totals:
|
|
|
| Ranking Worksheet |
|
Please report the total number from the
Yes
column below:
|
Website
|
Accuracy
|
Currency
|
Coverage
|
Authority
|
Objectivity
|
Total Rank
|
American Nonsmokers' Rights Foundation
|
R.J. Reynolds
|
American Lung Association
|
Smoking from all Sides
|
Tobacco Free Initiative
|
Tobacco Free Kids website
|
Big Drug's Nicotine War
|
Coalition for a Tobacco Free Midlands
|
Phillip Morris Tobacco Company
|
Children Opposed to Smoking Tobacco
|